Uncomplicate Access To Ivermectin

Ron DeSantis is killing it in Florida! Short of Trump, his policy actions have excited the Trump base more than any other ‘conservative’ that could appear on the next presidential ticket. On Gab, the question was asked about the DeSantis influence, ‘Why are his policies not being copied across the several states?’

To wit, I asked the question on the Missouri Governor’s site:

Why are we not ensuring that Missourians have access to every possible option for fighting off the Coronavirus… …especially safety-proven options like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine? And what about monoclonal treatments?

These drugs HAVE been studied by the NIH and found to reduce the symptoms and length of illness: 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/

Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are far less problematic than chemotherapy, yet we are treating cancer patients daily with such side-effect-inducing drugs.


My email could have been more informed and eloquent, but you get the point. Their surprisingly quick response with my emphasis :

Thank you for contacting the Department of Health and Senior Services.  The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin (sic) for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea. Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing. Taking large doses of ivermectin is dangerous. If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.

Please see the following hyperlinks from both the CDC: 

https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/han00449.asp 

and the FDA: 

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-cautions-against-use-hydroxychloroquine-or-chloroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or 

regarding ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

As for monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment information is readily available to medical professionals, patients, and their family members.  Included on both web pages are links to provider locations.

The US Department of Health & Human Services web page has a link that allows users to find available infusion centers within a self-specified distance of their location.  Link to the locator service: https://covid.infusioncenter.org/

The Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services web page also has a link to help find locations that are providing mAb treatment.  Link to the map:  

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/108d4759232e4ca99c41e960831a1729.

Some providers are only providing mAb infusions to their own patients, so be sure to ask your healthcare provider, local hospital or local community health clinic.

IT IS A SHAMEFUL FALSE ASSERTION TO TELL MISSOURIANS that “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19” .

From the NIH Study in my email link sent to DHSS:

[NIH] Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

That’s it. Pandemic over. Fleecing of the American public via FDA, CDC, and Pfizer (et al) shall end.

  • With the clear efficacy Ivermectin, why wouldn’t the Governor and DHSS promote its safe use based on the NIH study?
  • Why would they choose to link to the anecdotal CDC article denouncing the use of Ivermectin if the NIH confirms otherwise?
  • While thousands are dying from the ‘vaccine’, if Ivermectin overdose was such a concern, wouldn’t the CDC list some deaths and not a couple of anecdotal fully-recovered stories of which they are ‘aware’?
  • Why wouldn’t DHSS assist with the distribution of the drug instead of sitting idly by as the FDA and USPS are suspected of interfering?

Apparently you can get Monoclonal Antibody Treatments fairly easily in Missouri and thank goodness for that.

So, we ask the DHSS to, at least, stop imparting untrue data regarding Ivermectin and to review and revise their stance regarding Ivermectin. We ask that they re-investigate Hydroxychloroquine for its efficacy. And, we ask that they consider ANY other mechanism with low side-effects, reduced mortality, reduced time to clinical recovery, reduced time to viral clearance, and significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19… …like Ivermectin.

This is not Fake News; this Ivermectin study is directly from the NIH web site. We follow the science, right?!

All you hear on KTVI, KSDK, and KMOV (et al) is ‘vaccine, vaccine, vaccine!’ (Why they are allowed to advertise for a drug [‘vaccine’] without listing its side-effects is beyond me… …but I digress). An excellent, safe, Nobel Prize-winning alternative is Ivermectin. The Governor and DHSS should be ensuring uncomplicated access to its use; not falling in line with the pushers of a ‘vaccine’ therapy with clear issues and unknown long-term side-effects.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: